三民網路書店 / 搜尋結果

讓學生提升成績表現與學習動機、讓老師獲得跨學科統整技能讓所有人學習辨識假資訊、民粹主義，關鍵都是批判性思考──過去難學難教，如今以thinkLaw策略，一切具體實現全美40州採用的新式批判性思考教學法用新的觀點與作法，重啟21世紀必備技能「教育改革」四個字陪伴每一代人長大，每一次教改處理的問題與擘畫的願景都不盡相同，引起的討論與爭議也總難以停歇，僅有的共同點，就是面對變遷與尋找應對方法的焦慮，以及是否真能讓學生獲得深度學習的疑惑。現今課綱的重點從「學知識」轉向「學素養」。舊式的應試教育早已過時，改為強調學生主動發展思辨能力、跨領域運用技能，而這些要求的核心皆為批判性思考。同時，批判性思考還能讓學生有動力也有能力發現、探尋、操作自己有興趣的事物。但現實讓學校教學常得花大量心力縮小學生的成績差距，無暇顧及這項基本素養，而所謂資優教育，著重的也常是超前學習，而非激發學生的潛能。所有人都認知到批判性思考的重要性甚至迫切性，問題只出在學生學不到、老師沒有時間教或不知道怎麼教。更大的隱患則是，教育改革常無意間擴大城鄉及階級差距。本書作者希爾為訴訟律師，兒時是學校頭痛的頑劣學生，憑著資質及中低收入家庭小孩求生存的街頭智慧，在轉型教育及法學院大放異彩。他從自己的學習過程及長期參與第一線弱勢學生國高中教育現場的經驗出發，體認到批判性思考是任何背景、學校的學生都能學習的技巧，並發現法律判例和律師的思維模式是培養批判性思考的極佳工具，由於過程充滿辦案的樂趣，且涉及青少年格外敏感的不公不義，學生都很踴躍動腦，並提出自己的主張。例如一樁老婦人遭得來速熱咖啡燙傷而狀告麥當勞的案例，學生一開始都反射性認為是奧客濫訴牟利 ，但在開始練習擴大尋找證人證物後，便踏上了一場翻天覆地的思考革命：該蒐集哪些證人的論點（並辨識證人的偏見）？客觀資訊在哪裡（熱咖啡的溫度多高、老婦人是否有帕金森氏症）？為何必須衡量判決會對社會產生什麼影響？最後學生恍然大悟，不但理解法院判決麥當勞應付高額賠償金實屬應該，更能認識是非對錯的深層邏輯，而這一點在當代生活的重要性再如何強調都不為過。跟隨這些奇特且涉及重要價值的判例，搭配明確的DRAAW+C系統性步驟，當學生接受「像律師一樣思考」的訓練之後，就可以逐步理解律師的思考方式，一步步跳脫框架，從多個角度剖析事實、習慣以提問去取得所需資訊，並提出不同主張，找到辦法，以有效且相關的

This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. I

This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. I

"A comprehensive overview of the standard techniques of legal reasoning. It stands out because of the way it enriches the basic discussion with perspectives from legal history and theory."-Joan Willia

In 1996, historian and classicist Crook challenged historians to provide an "estimation of the place of Roman law in general history as an intellectual phenomenon, a topic in the history of ideas...ju

"This book reads like a legal thriller; it will leave you thinking about the nature of justice and inspired by the human spirit."-Sister Helen PrejeanJustice Imperiled is the story of the br

所謂法律思維，就是像律師一樣思考（Thinking Like A Lawyer），是依循法治精神，運用法律原則、法律規範和法律邏輯，分析和解決問題的思維方式，是一種理性思維。法律思維不是簡單地背誦法律條文。本書的重點不是向創業者介紹有關法律條文，而是著重于闡述創業者如何進行法律思維、如何運用法律思維解決實際問題以及如何利用法律資源達成戰略目標。對企業而言，法律不僅是經濟行為規範，法律還是一種經營資

Samuel (law, Kent Law School, UK) questions the European view that the knowledge of law is merely a knowledge of rules. But what does thinking like a lawyer actually involve? Focused mainly on Englis

What does it mean today to 'think like a lawyer'? Drawing on extensive interviews with men and women attorneys, the authors explore how moral reasoning affects lawyers' understanding of justice and their own role in promoting it. This examination of personal and institutional imperatives in the legal profession, illustrated with quotations from the lawyers themselves, raises questions that transcend traditional discussions of legal ethics. The authors examine: the relationship between gender and patterns of moral thinking; the ways that personal morality affects public and professional responsibility; the legal system's response to social changes in public ethics and in women's roles. In conclusion the authors offer suggestions for constructive changes in legal education and the code of professional ethics to foster morally responsive democracy. All those concerned with moral reasoning, gender roles, and the evolution of the legal system will find this stimulating and timely reading.

What does it mean today to 'think like a lawyer'? Drawing on extensive interviews with men and women attorneys, the authors explore how moral reasoning affects lawyers' understanding of justice and their own role in promoting it. This examination of personal and institutional imperatives in the legal profession, illustrated with quotations from the lawyers themselves, raises questions that transcend traditional discussions of legal ethics. The authors examine: the relationship between gender and patterns of moral thinking; the ways that personal morality affects public and professional responsibility; the legal system's response to social changes in public ethics and in women's roles. In conclusion the authors offer suggestions for constructive changes in legal education and the code of professional ethics to foster morally responsive democracy. All those concerned with moral reasoning, gender roles, and the evolution of the legal system will find this stimulating and timely reading.

Over the last decade, cost pressures, technology, automation, globalisation, de-regulation, and changing client relationships have transformed the practice of law, but legal education has been slow to respond. Deciding what learning objectives a law degree ought to prioritise, and how to best strike the balance between vocational and academic training, are questions of growing importance for students, regulators, educators, and the legal profession. This collection provides a range of perspectives on the suite of skills required by the future lawyer and the various approaches to supporting their acquisition. Contributions report on a variety of curriculum initiatives, including role-play, gamification, virtual reality, project-based learning, design thinking, data analytics, clinical legal education, apprenticeships, experiential learning and regulatory reform, and in doing so, offer a vision of what modern legal education might look like.