Torture And The Ticking Bomb

This timely and passionate book is the first to address itself to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz's controversial arguments for the limited use of interrogational torture and its legalisation.
Argues that the respectability Dershowitz's arguments confer on the view that torture is a legitimate weapon in the war on terror needs urgently to be countered
Takes on the advocates of torture on their own utilitarian grounds
Timely and passionately written, in an accessible, jargon-free style
Forms part of the provocative and timely Blackwell Public Philosophy series

Bob Brecher is Reader in Moral Philosophy at the University of Brighton, UK and Director of its Centre for Applied Philosophy, Politics and Ethics. He is the author of two previous books, Anselm's Argument: the Logic of Divine Existence and Getting What You Want?: a Critique of Liberal Morality (1998). He has published widely in ethics and social and political philosophy and was the founding editor of the journal Res Publica.

“Bob Brecher has accepted the challenge of the defenders of torture in this excellent book.” (Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, February 2009)
"(Dershowitz's) premise is subjected to a withering scrutiny in this brilliant deconstruction by the moral philosopher Bob Brecher. In a comprehensive critique of the 'ticking bomb' hypothesis, Brecher exposes the moral and intellectual flaws in Dershowitz's arguments and shows how easily such pragmatic rationalisations can open the door to the creation of a 'tortuous society'. It's a task that Brecher accomplishes with grace, moral passion and unswerving logic." (Red Pepper, March 2008)
"A splendid attack on the appalling idea of legalising torture." (Will Podmore)
“A salutary antidote to those who would waver on the issue [of torture]…Brecher opens up the wider utilitarian implications that arise.” (Planet Magazine)
“Brecher … does not reflexively dismiss the advocates of torture … .He carefully cites the errors of their arguments, using logic, expert opinion, and moral reasoning.” (PsycCritiques)
"Brecher relentlessly deconstructs the most misleading hypothetical of our time. His lively and valuable book shows that even 'noble cause' torture is always counterproductive."
–Geoffrey Robertson QC, Doughty Street Chambers
"Quite simply, this book is the most powerful and comprehensive challenge available to a piece of intellectual fraud having wide commerce today – that under some hypothetical situation the infliction of pain to break another’s will is morally justifiable. The ticking bomb, in Brecher’s analysis, is a fantasy that hardly yields grounds sufficient for the employment of interrogational torture. Here the philosopher’s role towards that fantasy is quite clear: debunk it!"
–Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez, Youngstown State University

Preface.

1. Introduction.

What is Torture?.

Dershowitz on Interrogational Torture.

Why Write about Torture?.

The Agenda.

2. The Fantasy of the Ticking Bomb Scenario Dershowitz's Argument and the Ticking Bomb.

Who Tortures?.

Effectiveness and Time.

Knowledge and Necessity.

The Ticking Bomb Scenario: Conclusion.

3. The Consequences of Normalizing Interrogational Torture.

Some Clarifications.

Three Positive Claims about the Consequences of Legalizing Interrogational Torture.

The Institutionalization of Interrogational Torture.

A Torturous Society.

4. Torture, Death and Philosophy Torture.

Torture, Death and Interrogation.

Why No Decent Society Can Torture.

Torture, the "War on Terror" and Intellectual Irresponsibility.

But What If Torture Really Is the Only Possible Way to Avoid Catastrophe?.

Two Final Points.

Notes.

Bibliography.

Index