Dissent and the Supreme Court ─ Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue
商品資訊
ISBN13:9780307379405
出版社:Random House Inc
作者:Melvin I. Urofsky
出版日:2015/10/13
裝訂/頁數:精裝/544頁
規格:24.8cm*16.5cm*4.4cm (高/寬/厚)
版次:1
定價
:NT$ 1330 元優惠價
:79 折 1051 元
絕版無法訂購
商品簡介
作者簡介
相關商品
商品簡介
From the revered judicial authority—author of Louis D. Brandeis, Division and Discord, andSupreme Decisions—a major book that looks at the role of dissent in the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution through the greatest and longest lasting (226 years) public policy debate in the country’s history, among members of the Supreme Court, between the Court and the other branches of government, and between the Court and the people of the United States.
Melvin Urofsky writes of the necessity of constitutional dialogue as one of the ways in which we as a people reinvent and reinvigorate our democratic society. InDissent and the Supreme Court, he explores the great dissents throughout the Court’s 226-year-history. He discusses in detail the role the Supreme Court has played in helping to define what the Constitution means, how the Court’s majority opinions have not always been right, and how the dissenters, by positing alternative interpretations, have initiated a critical dialogue about what a particular decision should mean. This dialogue, Urofsky writes, is sometimes resolved quickly; other times it may take decades before the Court adjusts its position. Louis Brandeis’s dissenting opinion about wiretapping became the position of the Court four decades after it was written. The Court took six decades to adopt the dissenting opinion of the first Justice Harlan inPlessy v. Ferguson (1896)—that segregation on the basis of race violated the Constitution—in its decision inBrown v. Board of Education (1954).
(With black-and-white illustrations throughout.)
Melvin Urofsky writes of the necessity of constitutional dialogue as one of the ways in which we as a people reinvent and reinvigorate our democratic society. InDissent and the Supreme Court, he explores the great dissents throughout the Court’s 226-year-history. He discusses in detail the role the Supreme Court has played in helping to define what the Constitution means, how the Court’s majority opinions have not always been right, and how the dissenters, by positing alternative interpretations, have initiated a critical dialogue about what a particular decision should mean. This dialogue, Urofsky writes, is sometimes resolved quickly; other times it may take decades before the Court adjusts its position. Louis Brandeis’s dissenting opinion about wiretapping became the position of the Court four decades after it was written. The Court took six decades to adopt the dissenting opinion of the first Justice Harlan inPlessy v. Ferguson (1896)—that segregation on the basis of race violated the Constitution—in its decision inBrown v. Board of Education (1954).
(With black-and-white illustrations throughout.)
作者簡介
MELVIN I. UROFSKY is professor of law and public policy and a professor emeritus of history at Virginia Commonwealth University and was the chair of its history department. He is the editor (with David W. Levy) of the five-volume collection of Louis Brandeis’s letters, as well as the author of American Zionism from Herzl to the Holocaust andLouis D. Brandeis. He lives in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
主題書展
更多
主題書展
更多書展今日66折
您曾經瀏覽過的商品
購物須知
外文書商品之書封,為出版社提供之樣本。實際出貨商品,以出版社所提供之現有版本為主。部份書籍,因出版社供應狀況特殊,匯率將依實際狀況做調整。
無庫存之商品,在您完成訂單程序之後,將以空運的方式為你下單調貨。為了縮短等待的時間,建議您將外文書與其他商品分開下單,以獲得最快的取貨速度,平均調貨時間為1~2個月。
為了保護您的權益,「三民網路書店」提供會員七日商品鑑賞期(收到商品為起始日)。
若要辦理退貨,請在商品鑑賞期內寄回,且商品必須是全新狀態與完整包裝(商品、附件、發票、隨貨贈品等)否則恕不接受退貨。