三民網路書店 / 搜尋結果

挑戰《想像的共同體》的伊斯蘭版本共享單一價值觀、宗教、文化、全球大團結這樣的「穆斯林世界」真的存在嗎？揭開15億人口「單一穆斯林共同體」的面紗以全球史視角解構，重新省視伊斯蘭獨家收錄中文版作者序．學界專文導讀------------「這是第一本以全球史視角取徑、伊斯蘭為主題的思想史專書。不只是做為經典，以當前國際局勢來說，本書的出版更是至為重要。」──江孟勳，本書譯者，中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心博士後研究------------如今多數人都認為，全球有一個統一的穆斯林共同體，共享單一的價值觀與宗教文化。但是，秉持伊斯蘭亞洲主義的土耳其裔學者艾丁提出了一個極為挑釁的說法：他認為，所謂全世界15億穆斯林構成的一個單一的宗教政治實體，是一種誤解。這種觀念如何產生，以及為何它如此普遍？本書追溯了這樣一個錯誤觀念的思想根源，並解釋為何這個概念對非穆斯林和穆斯林都深具吸引力。做為西方基督教文明的對立面，穆斯林世界的概念出現在十九世紀末，當時歐洲帝國統治大多數的穆斯林。這個共同體概念從一開始就受到白人優越主義的影響，但穆斯林也參與了這一思想的形成。艾丁揭示了穆斯林知識分子如何憧憬著一個理想化的泛伊斯蘭社會，並將其本質化。這樣的一個共同體社會駁斥了關於穆斯林種族和文明低劣的說法。穆斯林共同體的理念，對前近代帝國後期哈里發的統治發揮了關鍵作用，更在去殖民化和冷戰中倖存下來，於二十世紀末產生新的力量。站在仇視伊斯蘭和泛伊斯蘭意識形態的立場，穆斯林共同體的觀念也繼續控制著全球。為了更有效討論當今穆斯林社會的政治實況，這樣的觀念需要被打破。當以巴再次掀起衝突、兩造再度訴諸國際團結、打擊異己的此刻，我們所設下的新種族主義式禁令或恐懼，或是「只有穆斯林團結才能解救穆斯林」的泛社群想法，都將再一次鞏固穆斯林共同體的邊界。這也是為什麼，我們迫切需要一個不同的論述跟思考方式，才能去想像一個不同的未來。

When President Obama visited Cairo to address Muslims worldwide, he followed in the footsteps of countless politicians who have taken the existence of a unified global Muslim community for granted. Bu

When President Barack Obama visited Cairo in 2009 to deliver an address to Muslims worldwide, he followed in the footsteps of countless politicians who have taken the existence of a unified global Mus

A quarterly magazine of ideas and issues showcasing ground breaking thinking on Islam and what it means to be a Muslim in a rapidly changing, interconnected world.

In the social sciences, civilization is one of the most oft-debated concepts. However, debates around civilization are still framed by Western assumptions and concerns as with the very idea of civili

This examination of the formally autonomous state of Hyderabad in a global comparative framework challenges the idea of the dominant British Raj as the sole sovereign power in the late colonial period. Beverley argues that Hyderabad's position as a subordinate yet sovereign 'minor state' was not just a legal formality, but that in exercising the right to internal self-government and acting as a conduit for the regeneration of transnational Muslim intellectual and political networks, Hyderabad was indicative of the fragmentation of sovereignty between multiple political entities amidst empires. By exploring connections with the Muslim world beyond South Asia, law and policy administration along frontiers with the colonial state, and urban planning in expanding Hyderabad City, Beverley presents Hyderabad as a locus for experimentation in global and regional forms of political modernity. This book recasts the political geography of late imperialism and historicises Muslim political modern

This examination of the formally autonomous state of Hyderabad in a global comparative framework challenges the idea of the dominant British Raj as the sole sovereign power in the late colonial period. Beverley argues that Hyderabad's position as a subordinate yet sovereign 'minor state' was not just a legal formality, but that in exercising the right to internal self-government and acting as a conduit for the regeneration of transnational Muslim intellectual and political networks, Hyderabad was indicative of the fragmentation of sovereignty between multiple political entities amidst empires. By exploring connections with the Muslim world beyond South Asia, law and policy administration along frontiers with the colonial state, and urban planning in expanding Hyderabad City, Beverley presents Hyderabad as a locus for experimentation in global and regional forms of political modernity. This book recasts the political geography of late imperialism and historicises Muslim political modern

At a time when violent images of the Muslim world dominate our headlines, Western audiences are growing increasingly interested in a different picture of Islam, specifically the idea of Muslim nonviol